Files
asepharyana-hub-guide/skills/clean-architecture/SKILL.md
T
asepharyana e513cddd68 feat(hub-guide): expand plugin with 26 best-practice skills, hooks, and references
Transform hub-guide from a single-skill Hub monorepo guide into a
comprehensive programming best-practice plugin covering all situations.

Skills (26):
- Core: engineering-principles, clean-code, clean-architecture,
  design-patterns, testing, error-handling, security, api-design,
  git-workflow, documentation, logging-observability, performance
- Languages: typescript, python, rust, go
- Frameworks: react-frontend, elysiajs, hono-backend, drizzle-database, nextjs
- Infrastructure: docker, ci-cd, monitoring
- Monorepo: monorepo, hub-guide (existing)

Hooks:
- SessionStart: auto-detect project type and activate relevant skills
- PreToolUse (Write|Edit): inject language-specific rules per file type

Reference files for deep dives:
- clean-architecture/references/solid.md (SOLID + component principles)
- design-patterns/references/catalog.md (full GoF catalog with examples)
- testing/references/mocks.md (test double taxonomy)

Restructure plugin to modern skills/ directory format.
2026-07-25 11:35:16 +07:00

95 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown

---
name: clean-architecture
description: Apply Clean Architecture, hexagonal architecture, and SOLID principles when designing system boundaries, modules, or microservices. Use when structuring a new service, deciding what a component should own, untangling framework coupling, or whenever the user mentions "clean architecture," "hexagonal architecture," "onion architecture," "ports and adapters," "SOLID," "Dependency Rule," or "architecture boundaries."
---
# Clean Architecture
Keep business rules independent of frameworks, databases, and UI.
## The Dependency Rule
**Source code dependencies must point inward.** Nothing in an inner circle can know about something in an outer circle.
```
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ Framework / DB / UI / IO │ ← outer: frameworks, drivers, devices
│ ┌──────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Interface Adapters │ │ ← presenters, controllers, gateways
│ │ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Application (Use Cases) │ │ ← orchestrate business flows
│ │ │ ┌──────────────────┐ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ Domain / Entities│ │ │ │ ← pure business rules, no deps
│ │ │ └──────────────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────────────────┘ │ │
│ └──────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────┘
```
## Key Rules
1. **Domain layer** contains business entities and value objects. Zero framework imports. Zero database imports. Pure types and functions.
2. **Application layer** contains use cases — orchestrate domain objects to fulfill business flows. Depends only on domain. Declares ports (interfaces) for IO.
3. **Interface adapters** translate between use cases and the outside world — controllers, presenters, gateways. Depends on application layer + frameworks.
4. **Infrastructure/Framework layer** implements the ports declared by the application layer — database repos, HTTP clients, message queues.
5. **Screaming Architecture:** the project structure should scream "this is a [domain context]" — not "this is a Spring/Next.js/Django project."
## How to Check
- Can you swap the database without changing business logic? If not, boundary is violated.
- Can you unit-test a use case without spinning up a framework? If not, your use case depends on infrastructure.
- Do business entities import anything from the web framework or ORM? If so, revert that dependency.
## Practical Patterns
### Port-Adapter
```typescript
// Domain/Application port (declared here, implemented outside)
interface UserRepository {
findById(id: string): Promise<User | null>;
}
// Infrastructure adapter (implemented in infra layer)
class PostgresUserRepository implements UserRepository { ... }
```
### Use Case
```typescript
class CreateOrderUseCase {
constructor(private readonly repo: OrderRepository) {}
async execute(input: CreateOrderInput): Promise<Order> {
const order = Order.create(input.items, input.customerId);
return this.repo.save(order);
}
}
```
### Dependency Injection
Wire dependencies at the composition root — never in use cases or domain.
```typescript
// Composition Root
const orderRepo = new PostgresOrderRepository(db);
const createOrder = new CreateOrderUseCase(orderRepo);
```
## SOLID (Quick Ref)
- **SRP:** A class has one reason to change (one actor).
- **OCP:** Open for extension, closed for modification (polymorphism + strategy).
- **LSP:** Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.
- **ISP:** Don't depend on interfaces you don't use (keep interfaces focused).
- **DIP:** Depend on abstractions, not concretions. Business rules don't import frameworks.
## Deeper Reference
When the task calls for it, load:
- **[references/solid.md](references/solid.md)** — Full SOLID treatment (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP). Component principles (REP, CCP, CRP, ADP, SDP, SAP). Examples for each principle, historical evolution, and practical tests for violations.
## Anti-patterns
- ❌ Business logic in route handlers or controllers
- ❌ ORM entities directly exposed to the UI
- ❌ Database queries mixed into use cases
- ❌ Framework decorators on domain entities
- ❌ "Everything is a CRUD" — missing use case layer