Even with the prompt firewall (username vs content), the LLM can still
occasionally mis-apply a content-level zero-tolerance flag (sara /
conflict_instigation) to a message whose ONLY violation is the username
(e.g. 'matikanetanyahu'). The auto-delete eligibility check only recognized
exact offensive_username flags, so such false positives still deleted the
message.
Add a belt-and-suspenders guard in isNicknameOnlyViolation: if the flag set
is entirely username-attributable (offensive_username/sara/conflict_instigation)
AND the analysis text corroborates that the violation is username-only with
clean message content, route to nickname-reset instead of message deletion.
Adds 6 test cases covering the real matikanetanyahu scenario and the
false-positive/negative boundaries.
asepharyana
85204ca6f0