fix(gateway): un-claim budget-overflow messages stuck in processing
getPendingMessagesByConversation() flips every fetched pending row to 'processing', then pickBatchWithinBudget() may stop early on the token budget. The tail rows that did NOT make the batch were never un-claimed, so they stayed 'processing' forever — the recovery worker reverted them (120s) only for the next wave to re-claim them, an infinite loop of stuck messages that never get analyzed (saw 22 rows, some recycled for 40+ minutes). - add computeBudgetOverflowMessages() pure helper (batchBudget.ts) - batchScheduler un-claims overflow rows back to 'pending' before dispatching the trimmed batch - recovery-worker now reverts stuck processing unconditionally (the old 'conversationProcessing.size > 0' guard skipped the revert when the in-memory lock map was empty, e.g. fresh boot — exactly when stranded rows from a previous process need rescuing) - 3 regression tests for the overflow helper
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ef7708bf7d
commit
80daa9f045
4 files changed
+148
-14
No files matched your search
@@ -43,3 +43,22 @@ export function pickBatchWithinBudget(
|
||||
|
||||
return batch;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns the messages that were fetched/claimed but did NOT make it into the
|
||||
* trimmed batch (i.e. the tail past the token budget).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The DB claim step flips every fetched pending row to `processing`; the batch
|
||||
* trim may then stop early on the token budget. Those tail rows would stay
|
||||
* stuck in `processing` forever unless the caller explicitly un-claims them —
|
||||
* this helper identifies exactly which rows that is, so the caller can write
|
||||
* them back to `pending` for the next wave.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function computeBudgetOverflowMessages(
|
||||
claimed: MessageRecord[],
|
||||
trimmed: MessageRecord[],
|
||||
): MessageRecord[] {
|
||||
if (trimmed.length === 0) return claimed;
|
||||
const trimmedIds = new Set(trimmed.map((m) => m.id));
|
||||
return claimed.filter((m) => !trimmedIds.has(m.id));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user