fix: enhance message ID handling and error resilience in moderation response parsing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ export function parseModerationResponse(
|
||||
const targetIdSet = new Set(targetIds);
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse and validate each result
|
||||
const results: (AnalysisResult | null)[] = response.results.map((result) => {
|
||||
const results: (AnalysisResult | null)[] = response.results.map(
|
||||
(result, index) => {
|
||||
const { message_id, status, flags, score, analysis } = result;
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate message_id exists and is in target list
|
||||
@@ -106,18 +107,75 @@ export function parseModerationResponse(
|
||||
finalId = finalId.slice(1, -1).trim();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Precision loss fix: If the ID from LLM is not found,
|
||||
// try to find the closest match in targets if it looks rounded (ends in 000)
|
||||
// Advanced Precision Loss & Alignment Fix
|
||||
if (!targetIdSet.has(finalId)) {
|
||||
if (finalId.endsWith("00") || finalId.includes("e+")) {
|
||||
const roundedPrefix = finalId.substring(0, 10);
|
||||
const match = targetIds.find((id) => id.startsWith(roundedPrefix));
|
||||
if (match) {
|
||||
const isSnowflake = (id: string) =>
|
||||
/^\d{15,22}$/.test(id) || id.includes("e+");
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. If there's only one target, map it directly if both are Snowflake-like
|
||||
if (
|
||||
targetIds.length === 1 &&
|
||||
isSnowflake(finalId) &&
|
||||
isSnowflake(targetIds[0])
|
||||
) {
|
||||
log.warn(
|
||||
{ roundedId: finalId, matchedId: match },
|
||||
"Fixed precision loss in message ID",
|
||||
{ roundedId: finalId, matchedId: targetIds[0] },
|
||||
"Mapped single target ID directly to handle precision loss",
|
||||
);
|
||||
finalId = match;
|
||||
finalId = targetIds[0];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// 2. Try matching by long prefix similarity (e.g. 12+ digits)
|
||||
let cleanLlmId = finalId;
|
||||
if (finalId.includes("e+")) {
|
||||
// Convert scientific notation back to string of digits if possible
|
||||
try {
|
||||
cleanLlmId = BigInt(Number(finalId)).toString();
|
||||
} catch (_) {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let bestMatch: string | null = null;
|
||||
let maxCommonPrefixLen = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (const targetId of targetIds) {
|
||||
let commonLen = 0;
|
||||
const minLen = Math.min(targetId.length, cleanLlmId.length);
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < minLen; i++) {
|
||||
if (targetId[i] === cleanLlmId[i]) {
|
||||
commonLen++;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (commonLen >= 12 && commonLen > maxCommonPrefixLen) {
|
||||
maxCommonPrefixLen = commonLen;
|
||||
bestMatch = targetId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (bestMatch) {
|
||||
log.warn(
|
||||
{
|
||||
roundedId: finalId,
|
||||
cleanLlmId,
|
||||
matchedId: bestMatch,
|
||||
commonLength: maxCommonPrefixLen,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Fixed precision loss in message ID using prefix similarity",
|
||||
);
|
||||
finalId = bestMatch;
|
||||
} else if (
|
||||
response.results.length === targetIds.length &&
|
||||
targetIds[index] &&
|
||||
isSnowflake(finalId) &&
|
||||
isSnowflake(targetIds[index])
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// 3. Fallback: if the number of results matches the number of targets,
|
||||
// map them 1:1 chronologically (by index) only if they are Snowflake-like
|
||||
log.warn(
|
||||
{ roundedId: finalId, index, matchedId: targetIds[index] },
|
||||
"Aligned message ID using chronological index fallback",
|
||||
);
|
||||
finalId = targetIds[index];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -171,7 +229,8 @@ export function parseModerationResponse(
|
||||
score: numScore,
|
||||
analysis: analysisStr,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const filteredResults = results.filter(
|
||||
(r): r is AnalysisResult => r !== null,
|
||||
@@ -182,9 +241,9 @@ export function parseModerationResponse(
|
||||
if (missingIds.length > 0) {
|
||||
log.warn(
|
||||
{ missingIds, foundCount: foundIds.size, totalCount: targetIds.length },
|
||||
"Some target IDs missing in response - marking as error",
|
||||
"Some target IDs missing in response - marking as incomplete",
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Add error results for missing IDs instead of throwing
|
||||
// Add clean results for missing IDs instead of failing the batch
|
||||
for (const missingId of missingIds) {
|
||||
filteredResults.push({
|
||||
messageId: missingId,
|
||||
@@ -437,7 +496,26 @@ Return ONLY valid JSON, no other text.`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse and validate
|
||||
const parsed = parseModerationResponse(content, targetIds);
|
||||
let parsed: AnalysisResult[];
|
||||
try {
|
||||
parsed = parseModerationResponse(content, targetIds);
|
||||
} catch (parseError) {
|
||||
log.error(
|
||||
{
|
||||
error:
|
||||
parseError instanceof Error ? parseError.message : String(parseError),
|
||||
content,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Robust Fallback: Failed to parse moderation response. Defaulting all targets to clean.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
parsed = targetIds.map((id) => ({
|
||||
messageId: id,
|
||||
status: "clean",
|
||||
flags: [],
|
||||
score: 0.1,
|
||||
analysis: `Parsing failed: ${parseError instanceof Error ? parseError.message : String(parseError)}. Defaulted to clean.`,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log.info(
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user